Go Back   Palimpsest > Palimpsest Forums > All About Palimpsest > Doing Stuff

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st Feb 2007, 14:04   #21
John Self
suffers from smallness of vision
John Self's Avatar
Join Date: 27 Jun 2003
Location: Belfast
Posts: 15,939
Default Re: Notes on Posting

That seems sensible, Ang.

Whenever you post, consider whether your comments could reasonably be seen as arrogant, aggressive or combative, and adjust them accordingly. This is a forum for friendly discussion.
Reading Vasily Grossman, Life and Fate | Asylum | Book List
John Self is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd Feb 2007, 22:25   #22
John from Paris
laughs in the face of fear
John from Paris's Avatar
Join Date: 24 Sep 2006
Location: Paris (since 1985)
Posts: 982
Default Re: Notes on Posting

Considering the flashpoints which have occurred over the last day or so, I just wanted to say I find these guidelines eminently sensible.
I've noticed myself that it is all too easy to i) react too quickly to something that one doesn't agree with; or ii) use turns of phrase that can be interpreted as hostile or accusatory. Or, of course, both...
For example, and for the record, my original draft [which I have kept on my computer] to this post, where I responded to John Self's thoughts on Jonathan Coe's What A Carve Up!, started as follows:
I think it is rather arrogant of you to decree that you have demoted What A Carve Up! from to
When I intend to write quite a lot and/or about something I have strong views about, and even more when disagreement with another member is involved, I really feel it is a good idea to do a draft, which can then be copied and pasted onto the forum.

[personal anecdote edited out]

I think it is vital to respect protocol, and that this has to be shared and generally accepted protocol.

Last edited by John from Paris; 4th Feb 2007 at 22:13. Reason: personal anecdote edited out
John from Paris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd Feb 2007, 11:34   #23
Senior Palimpsester
suckles at the teat of the Palim-God
Ang's Avatar
Join Date: 25 Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,199
Default Re: Notes on Posting

Originally Posted by Wavid View Post
1. Reading threads before replying to them

It might be a good idea to do this. It helps to stop conversations going round and round in circles for one thing. Most threads aren't so lengthy that it is unfeasible to do so. This really is the preferred option here.

However, there are times when it isn't possible, especially if it is a quick query on a specific matter inside a gigantic thread. Most of the time it doesn't matter of course, because that issue might not have been discussed before. But, if it has been, then it's perfectly reasonable for members aware of the thread's history to post links to where in the thread the matter was discussed.

The 'crime' of posting something repetitive though, is simply nowhere near the Number One offence of...

3. Threads for Authors or Threads for Books?

A most contentious issue, this. The official (I think) Palimp line is that if you are reviewing a book by, or information or a questions about, an author who hasn't been covered before, then you can either start a thread with just the author's name, or one with the name and the book title.

If a thread exists for the author, then that's fine, put the review, information or question there.

If a thread exists for the author with a different book title, put yours there anyway. An admin will soon spot it and change the thread title to be just the author.

There are separate threads out there for authors with different books - these are largely historical and the thread content is often too complicated to merge them. Others will be picked up and merged as they are spotted.
Because of number 3, number 1 is difficult for me. When I've finished a book I love to read through the thread on that book and see what people think, but I don't want to read much about books I have not yet read - I enjoy a book so much more if I know nothing about it other than what made me choose it in the first place - the blurb on the back, or someone's brief recommendation posted here somewhere.

Please please please do not take this as a complaint - I just wondered if I am unusual in not wanting to know much before I start. I won't even let my husband tell me whether he likes it or not anymore if he reads a book before me.

The lists that people create are a great way for me of choosing books, as there are a few of you here who I can just glance through your lists and be almost guaranteed I'll like what you like (Perfume being the notable exception so far). The additional lists, like top 10 novels written by women, and top 10 playful texts, are super for me because they don't tell me too much and I've so far this year read two excellent books recommended in those two threads alone.

So again, I'm not complaining, there is plenty for me to get on with for recommendations, but I'm less likely to read and respond to a thread about an author unless I've read all or most of his/her books.
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008=post 80611
Ang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th Oct 2014, 15:52   #24
is beyond help
amner's Avatar
Join Date: 10 Apr 2003
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 10,918
Default Re: Notes on Posting

test (bear with me!)
amner is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zoe Heller: Notes on a Scandal John Self Book Reviews 41 21st Oct 2009 11:16
Fyodor Dostoyevsky: Notes from Underground John Self Book Reviews 3 14th Jul 2008 10:13
Notes on euthanasia ethics kaninaki Politics & Society 163 21st Jun 2006 9:50

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 6:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.