PDA

View Full Version : Arm in arm in the armed forces


RC
19th Jan 2005, 21:29
Wed, January 19, 2005


A gay old time on base

New military policy allows chaplains to marry same-sex couples

By KATHLEEN HARRIS, Parliamentary Bureau

GAY AND lesbian army couples can now get married on military bases. The Canadian Forces has quietly drafted a policy calling for military chaplains to formally bless same-sex weddings. Guidelines -- considered "interim" until the federal government passes a law redefining marriage -- outline the process for pre-nuptial counselling and using the base chapel for same-sex ceremonies.

Col. Stan Johnstone, a military chaplain who helped draft the policy, said the guidelines reflect the primary role of ministering to all CF members and their families.

NO EXPECTATIONS

Johnstone said chaplains vary on personal convictions and theology, but don't discriminate against anyone in need of counsel.

The guidelines are "essentially a statement of the way the law is going. We don't put any expectations on people -- we expect them to function as we always do, according to the tenets of their church, their own conscience and the laws of the province," he said.

"No one is being put under any constraint to do something they wouldn't normally do."

The roughly 150 military chaplains who work on bases across the country aren't required to perform same-sex marriages if it's against their religious beliefs, but they have the responsibility to find a colleague to conduct the ceremony...

I have some mixed feelings about this but you've got to admit it is leading-edge.

bakunin_the_cat
21st Jan 2005, 11:05
GAY AND lesbian army couples can now get married on military bases. The Canadian Forces has quietly drafted a policy calling for military chaplains to formally bless same-sex weddings. ...

I have some mixed feelings about this but you've got to admit it is leading-edge.

Why the mixed feelings? Seems like a pretty progressive and reasonable step to me. And if you're going to allow same-sex marriages and/or civil unions in civilian society then why not within the military.

The only thing I can think of, is that by having relationships at all, either same-sex or otherwise, between different army personnel, then you could argue that people will have divided loyalties between saving a partner and working for the good of the team. But what do you want to do? If you ban relationships then people will just continue it on the sly, and will only be resentful that you're trying to break them up. At least if it's out in the open, it's a known risk which can be minimised by putting people in different jobs or different units.

HP
21st Jan 2005, 11:20
NO EXPECTATIONS

Rather an unfortunate sub-heading, given the context of the article .....

bakunin_the_cat
21st Jan 2005, 11:27
lol

not exactly brimming with confidence is it?

RC
21st Jan 2005, 14:24
Bak, a proper answer would have to be a very long one, a short answer would make me look a prude or a borderline homophobe and I am neither. It's easy to say 'Sure, why not, live and let live', and generally speaking that's my attitude, but I do have some reservations. And I know the answers, or some of them, to my objections, and they are not bad answers. This issue is not as simple as it may seem.